1975 Supreme(Cal) 358
High Court Of Calcutta
SABYASACHI MUKHERJI
MANAGING SHEBAITS OF BHUKAILASH DEBUTTER ESTATE - Appellant
Versus
WEALTH-TAX OFFICER, F-WARD AND ANR. - Respondent
Matter 32 Of 1973
Decided On : 12/11/1975
Exemption from wealth tax under Section 5(1)(i) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957, is available if the property is held under a trust or other legal obligation for a public purpose of a charitable or religious nature in India, irrespective of the application of the income.
Headnote:
WEALTH TAX ACT, 1957 - SECTION 5(1)(I) - INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 - SECTION 11(1)(A) - EXEMPTION FROM WEALTH TAX - PROPERTY HELD UNDER TRUST FOR CHARITABLE OR RELIGIOUS PURPOSES - CONDITIONS FOR EXEMPTION - APPLICATION OF INCOME - MISAPPLICATION OR BREACH OF TRUST - REOPENING OF ASSESSMENT - GROUNDS FOR BELIEVING INCOME ESCAPED ASSESSMENT - LACUNA IN LAW - LEGISLATIVE CONSIDERATION REQUIRED.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioners, managing shebaits of Bhukailash Debutter Estate, challenged notices issued under Section 17 of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957, for assessment years 1964-65 to 1967-68. The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal had earlier held that the debutter estate was a public religious endowment eligible for exemption under Section 4(3)(i) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922. The revenue issued notices under Section 17 of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957, alleging that the petitioners were misusing the trust funds for personal benefit.
Finding of the Court:
The court held that the application of the money held under a trust or under legal obligation is not a relevant consideration for exemption under Section 5(1)(i) of the Wealth-tax Act. The court found that there were no grounds for believing that the wealth of the assessee had escaped assessment or had been under-assessed.
Issues: Whether the exemption from wealth tax under Section 5(1)(i) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957, is available only if the income from the property held under trust is applied to charitable or religious purposes.
Ratio Decidendi: The court interpreted Section 5(1)(i) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957, and held that the exemption is available if the property is held under a trust or other legal obligation for a public purpose of a charitable or religious nature in India, irrespective of the application of the income. The court distinguished the provisions of the Wealth-tax Act from those of the Income-tax Act, which require the income to be applied to charitable or religious purposes for exemption.
Final Decision: The court quashed the notices issued under Section 17 of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957, and restrained the respondents from giving effect to the same. The court also quashed and set aside any assessment completed pursuant to the said notices.
( 1 ) IN this application under Article 226 of the Constitution the petitioners who are the managing shebaits of Bhukailash Debutter Estate challenge several notices dated November 23, 1972, issued under Section 17 of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957, for the assessment years 1964-65, 1965-66, 1966-67 and 1967-68. It appears that Maharaja Joynarain Ghosal, a pious Brahmin of immense wealth and great learning, had founded in 1188 B. S. what is known as Bhukailash Debutter Estate in Kidderpore near Calcutta. He had originally gifted certain properties to Shree Shree Rakta Kamaleswar Sib Thakur and, thereafter, there was an installation of the Thakurani called Shree Shree Patit Paban. Temples were constructed and from time to time the properties were dedicated and the temples so constructed and directed to be managed had continued to exist. It appears that there are substantial properties attached to the said temples. The income from the properties belonging to the Debutter Estate was not taxed under the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, for the assessment years 1953-54, 1954-55 and 1955-56, on the ground that income from the debutter estate was exempt under Section 4 (3) (i) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, as the properties were held under a public religious endowment. For the assessment years 1953-54, 1954-55 and 1955-56 the Income-tax Officer, thereafter, had issued notices under Section 34 of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, for taxing the income from the said debutter properties. The Income-tax Officer in the said assessment proceeding held that the main purpose of the endowment was puja of the deity established by the settlor in his own premises and the feeding of the poor was incidental to the puja. He, therefore, held that the endowment could not be considered to be a public charitable trust. The said assessment ultimately came up in appeal before the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Calcutta Bench "a". The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal disposed of the appeal holding that the debutter estate was a public religious endowment and was eligible for exemption under the provisions of Section 4 (3) (i) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922. Thereafter, there were applications under Section 66 (1) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, for referring certain questions of law. The Tribunal rejected the said applications on December 3, 1968. The revenue did not proceed further. Following the said decision of the Tribunal in all the subsequent years up to the assessment year 1963-64, the said debutter trust was treated as a public religious endowment eligible for exemption under Section 4 (3) (i) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922. On November 23, 1972, under Section 17 of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957, in respect of the assessment years 1964-65, 1965-66, 1966-67 and 1967-68, the notices were issued. The said notices are the subject-matter of challenge in this application. The petitioners contend that there were no materials for believing that any income of the assessee had escaped assessment during the relevant years. Under Section 5 (1 ) (i) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957, it is provided as follows: "5. (1) Wealth-tax shall not be payable by an assessee in respect of the following assets, and such assets shall not be included in the net wealth of the assessee- (i) any property held by him under trust or other legal obligation for any public purpose of a charitable or religious nature in India. " In this connection it would be relevant to refer to Section 4 (3) (i) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, which was as follows:"4. (3) Any income, profits or gains falling within the following classes shall not be included in the total income of the person receiving them: (i) subject to the provisions of Clause (c) of Sub-section (1) of Section 16, any income derived from property held under trust or other legal obligation wholly for religious or charitable purposes, in so far as such income is applied or accumulated for application to such