SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1975 Supreme(Cal) 349

AJAY KUMAR BASU
GOUR GOPAL DUTT – Appellant
Versus
SHANTILATA MITRA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ANINDYA MITRA, DIPANKAR GHOSH, MALLICK, R.C.DE, T.P.DAS

AJAY K. BASU, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an application for contempt of Court moved by the petitioner against the respondents for deliberately violating or flouting the solemn undertaking given to this Hon'ble Court by the respondents before Mr. Justice Sankar Prasad Mitra as His Lordship then was who issued the Rule for Contempt. The relevant order in the Rule is: It is ordered that the respondents Sm. Shantilata Mitra, Samirendra Nath Mitra, Sailendra Nath Mitra, Miss Namita Mitra, Mrs. Amita Bose and Mrs. Sabita Ghose to show cause why they should not be held guilty of contempt of this Court for the breach of undertaking given to this Hon'ble Court.

( 2 ) THIS case has a chequered history. The petitioner granted a sub-lease of the 'paramount Cinema' being premises No. 38, Upper Circular Road, Calcutta hereinafter referred to as the said premises to one Satyendra Nath Mitra, since deceased, for a term of 8 years more fully mentioned in the said lease. In July, 1955, the applicants instituted a suit being Suit No. 1833 of 1955 for ejectment against the said Satyendra Nath Mitra on the ground of default in payment of rent. On 10th July, 1958, a consent decree was passed where it was provid








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top