SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1975 Supreme(Cal) 385

SANKAR PRASAD MITRA, S.K.DUTTA
UNION OF INDIA – Appellant
Versus
DHIRUBHAI GOKULDAS VORA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
MALAY BASU, SOMEN CHANDRA BOSE, SOUMEN KUMAR GHOSH

SANKAR PRASAD MITRA, S. K. DUTTA

( 1 ) THE union of India and two other appellants have preferred an appeal against a judgment delivered by Mr. Justice Banerjee on the 24th November, 1975, adjourning the hearing of an application under Article 226 of the Constitution sine die on the ground of Proclamation of Emergency. This is Appeal No. FMAT 3261 of 1975. In this appeal the Union of India has made an interlocutory application praying that the order of Mr. Justice Banerjee be stayed and an earlier order of Mr. Justice Janah made on the 6th January, 1975 be vacated.

( 2 ) ON 7 May, 1971, the Maintenance of Internal Security Act (Act 26 of 1971), hereinafter called 'misa' came into force. There was a Proclamation of Emergency under Article 352 of the constitution by the president of India on December 3, 1971. By Amendment Ordinance No. 11 of 1974 promulgated on the 17th September, 1974, smuggling activities were included in the list of prejudicial acts envisaged by MISA. A Presidential order was passed under Article 359 on the 16th November, 1974, suspending for six moths the right to move any Court as also all proceedings pending in any Court with respect to order s of detention ma






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top