SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1975 Supreme(Cal) 46

MURARI MOHAN DUTT, NIRMAL CHANDRA MUKHERJI
SAMAR SOM – Appellant
Versus
SADHANA SOM – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
BHABANI PRASUN CHATTERJI, Dwijendra Nath Lahiri, MONI MOHAN MUKHERJEE, P.N.MITTER

M. M. DUTT, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal is at the instance of the husband against his wife and it arises out of a proceeding under Section 12 (1) (a) of the Hindu Marriage Act.

( 2 ) THE appellant, who is the husband, made an application under Section 12 (1) (a) of the Act. The marriage between the parties was solemnised on May 7, 1965, according to the Hindu rites. It was alleged that prior to the marriage the respondent had undergone an operation on June 28, 1955, by which her uterus was removed and as such, she was impotent at the time of the marriage and was unfit for consummation or bearing child to the appellant and was continuing to be so till the date of the presentation of the said application. Further, it was alleged that the respondent was always averse to marital relations with the appellant who had recently been able to find out the cause of such aversion.

( 3 ) ON the aforesaid allegations the appellant prayed that the marriage between the parties might be annulled by the court by a decree of nullity.

( 4 ) THE application was opposed by the wife and she filed a written-statement. In paragraph 7 of her written-statement she admitted that she had undergone an operation be








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top