N.C.TALUKDAR
LORD S. P. SINHA – Appellant
Versus
LABOUR ENFORCEMENT OFFICER – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS Rule is at the instance of three accused-petitioners directed against two orders dated the 28th August, 1972 and the 29th September, 1972 passed by Sri S. C. Nundy, Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Asansole in Case No. C/3912 of 1969 pending before him under section 9 (1) of eh Coal Mines Provident Fund and Bonus Scheme, 1948 for a contravention of the provisions of paragraph 11 (6) of the Coal Mines Bonus Scheme, 1948 rejecting respectively the petitioners prayer for pleading guilty and also their prayer for adjournment.
( 2 ) THE point involved are points of law arising in the context of facts which need not be set down in details excepting for a consideration of the points involved. The accused petitioners are some of the Directors of M/s. Macneill and Barry Ltd. , having its office at 2, Fairly Place, Calcutta. The said company was the Managing Agent of the M/s. Equitable Coal Co. , Ltd. , who are the owners of the Bhaladi Sand Line. The complainant-opposite party, Labour Enforcement Officer (Central) Niamatpur filed a petition of complaint in the Court of the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Asansole against the abovementioned Macneill and Barry Ltd.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.