SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1975 Supreme(Cal) 6

High Court Of Calcutta
SABYASACHI MUKHERJI, R. N. PYNE
CONTROLLER OF ESTATE DUTY - Appellant
Versus
JOHN GREGORY APCAR - Respondent
Matter 66  Of  1971
Decided On : 01/08/1975

The valuation of a deceased partner's share in a partnership, including goodwill, for the purpose of determining estate duty, should be made in accordance with the provisions of the partnership deed, but the surviving partners are liable for payment of duty in respect of the benefit accruing to them due to the death of the deceased, which is the market value of the goodwill less the value thereof as mentioned in the partnership deed.

Headnote:

ESTATE DUTY - Valuation of goodwill of partnership - Deceased partner's share - Determination - Partnership deed provisions - Market value - Benefit to surviving partners - Cesser of interest.

Fact of the Case:

Upon the death of a partner in a firm, the surviving partners succeeded to the deceased partner's share in the partnership business, property, and goodwill, undertaking all debts, liabilities, and obligations of the partnership. The partnership deed provided that the value of goodwill for the purpose of determining the deceased partner's share would be Rs. 1,00,000.

Finding of the Court:

The court held that for the purpose of determining the duty payable by the personal representative (widow) of the deceased, the share of the deceased in the firm, including its goodwill, valuation should be made in accordance with the provisions of the partnership deed dated December 14, 1952. However, for the purpose of determining the liability of the surviving partners for payment of duty in respect of the benefit accruing to them due to the death of the deceased, the market value of the goodwill less the value thereof as mentioned in the said deed should be taken into account for the purpose of valuation.

Issues: 1. Whether the value of the deceased partner's share in the partnership, including goodwill, should be determined in accordance with the provisions of the partnership deed or the market value. 2. Whether the surviving partners are liable for payment of duty in respect of the benefit accruing to them due to the death of the deceased.

Ratio Decidendi: 1. The court held that the value of the deceased partner's share in the partnership, including goodwill, should be determined in accordance with the provisions of the partnership deed for the purpose of determining the duty payable by the personal representative (widow) of the deceased. 2. The court held that the surviving partners are liable for payment of duty in respect of the benefit accruing to them due to the death of the deceased. The benefit to the surviving partners is to the extent of the market value of the goodwill less the sum of Rs. 1,00,000, being the amount which they are liable to pay to the personal representatives in terms of the partnership deed.

Final Decision: The court answered the question referred by saying that for the purpose of determining the duty payable by the personal representative (widow) of the deceased, the share of the deceased in the firm, Messrs. Talbot and Co., including its goodwill, valuation should be made in accordance with the provisions of the partnership deed dated December 14, 1952, but for the purpose of determining the liability of the surviving partners (the respondents herein) for payment of duty in respect of the benefit accruing to them due to the death of the deceased the market value of the goodwill less the value thereof as mentioned in the said deed should be taken into account for the purpose of valuation.

R. N. PYNE, J.

( 1 ) IN this reference under Section 64 (1) of the E. D. Act, 1953, arising out of the estate duty proceedings consequent on the death of one George Galstaun Apcar, deceased, we are concerned with the question regarding valuation of the goodwill of a partnership in which the deceased, during his lifetime, was a partner.

( 2 ) FOR better appreciation of the question referred to the court for its opinion, it is necessary to set out some of the relevant facts. They are: The deceased, John Galstaun Apcar (hereinafter referred to as "the deceased "), along with Mr. John S. Gregory and Mr. Sukumar Dey (hereinafter referred to as " the accountable persons ") were partners in a firm, M/s. Talbot and Co. , Calcutta, constituted by a deed of partnership dated December 14, 1962. The terms of the said deed of partnership relevant for our purpose may be stated. They are :" 17. As soon as possible after the 31st day of December in every year during the continuance of the partnership a general account shall be made up to such date of the credits, property, effects, debts and liabilities of the partnership and of all transactions matters and things usually comprehended in a general account of the like nature. Every such account shall be balanced agreed to and signed by all the partners and when so signed shall be binding on all the partners except that if any manifest error therein be detected and pointed out by any partner to the others and other of them within six months after such signature thereof such error shall be forthwith rectified. Immediately after the signing and settling of every such annual general account each partner shall be entitled to draw out and receive his share of the net profits of the business for the past year on bringing into account all monthly sums previously drawn out by him under the provisions in that behalf herein before contained. 18. If any partner shall die during the continuance of the partnership the surviving partner or partners shall as from the date of such death and if more than one in the proportions in which they were at such date entitled to share in the net profits of partnership succeed to the share of the deceased partner in the partnership business and the property and goodwill thereof and shall undertake all the debts, liabilities and obligations of the partnership and pay the representatives of the deceased partner as price of such share ; (a) His share in the capital and property of the partnership as ascertained by the last annual account taken prior to his death, and (b) His share of undrawn current profits up to the date of his death. 19. For the purpose of ascertaining the amount payable to the representatives of a deceased partner of his share in the goodwill of the business the value of such goodwill shall be deemed to be Rs. 1,00,000 which sum shall be added to the sum payable as aforesaid in respect of the deceased partner's share in the capital and property of the partnership. "

( 3 ) THE deceased executed a will on April 19, 1961, appointing his wife, Mrs. S. Mary Apcar, as the sole executrix. After the death of the deceased on April 17, 1965, the widow submitted an account showing the net value of the estate of the deceased at Rs. 1,50,616, including the share of the deceased in the said firm. The value of the business goodwill of the firm was stated to be Rs. 1,00,000. The Asst. CED did not accept this value of the goodwill and fixed the same at Rs. 5,00,000 and determined the proportionate value of the share accordingly. The total value of the estate was, therefore, determined at Rs. 3,28,745 and the assessment was made on it. Subsequently by an order dated May 8, 1967, passed under Section 61 of the E. D. Act, 1953 (hereinafter referred to as " the Act "), the Asst. CED revised the principal value and the accountable persons mentioned above were treated to be the accountable persons. Against this order dated May 8, 1967, the accountable persons preferred an ap










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top