DEB, DIPAK KUMAR SEN
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX – Appellant
Versus
NORTH DHEMO COAL COMPANY LTD. – Respondent
( 1 ) IN this reference under Section 66 (1) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, the following questions have been referred:" (1) Whether, on the facts and circumstances of this case, the assessee was entitled to full depreciation allowance under Section 10 (2) (vi) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, read with Rule 8 of the Rules thereto for the assessment years 1958-59 and 1959-60 ? (2) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of this case, the sum of Rs. 1. 65,424 was properly treated as revenue expenditure and allowed accordingly ?"
( 2 ) ON question No. 1, learned standing counsel appearing on behalf of the assessee did not seriously contest the position that in view of Rule 8 of the Indian Income-tax Rules, 1922, as construed by this court in the case of Anantapur Textiles Lid. v. Commissioner of Income-tax , it could not be disputed that the assessee will not be entitled to full depreciation as claimed. In the premises, the first question is answered in the negative and in favour of the revenue. We make it clear that the assessee will be entitled to depreciation for the relevant period as laid down in the Rules and not for the entire period.
( 3 )
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.