SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1975 Supreme(Cal) 210

DEB, DIPAK KUMAR SEN
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX – Appellant
Versus
NORTH DHEMO COAL COMPANY LTD. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.SEN GUPTA, D.GUPTA, P.CHOWDHURY, S.C.SEN, S.PAL

DIPAK KUMAR SEN, J.

( 1 ) IN this reference under Section 66 (1) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, the following questions have been referred:" (1) Whether, on the facts and circumstances of this case, the assessee was entitled to full depreciation allowance under Section 10 (2) (vi) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, read with Rule 8 of the Rules thereto for the assessment years 1958-59 and 1959-60 ? (2) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of this case, the sum of Rs. 1. 65,424 was properly treated as revenue expenditure and allowed accordingly ?"

( 2 ) ON question No. 1, learned standing counsel appearing on behalf of the assessee did not seriously contest the position that in view of Rule 8 of the Indian Income-tax Rules, 1922, as construed by this court in the case of Anantapur Textiles Lid. v. Commissioner of Income-tax , it could not be disputed that the assessee will not be entitled to full depreciation as claimed. In the premises, the first question is answered in the negative and in favour of the revenue. We make it clear that the assessee will be entitled to depreciation for the relevant period as laid down in the Rules and not for the entire period.

( 3 )


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top