R.BHATTACHARYYA
CHOTALAL SHAW – Appellant
Versus
RAM GOLAM SHAW – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS second appeal by the defendant is against the decision of the Additional District Judge, Baraset reversing the judgment and the decree passed by the Munsif dismissing the suit of the plaintiff for ejectment against the defendant.
( 2 ) THE plaintiff Ram Golam Shaw brought the suit against the defendant Ramdas Chotelal, a monthly tenant in respect of the suit premises at a rental of Rs. 23 payable according to English Calendar month. The allegations made in the plaint are that he has been carrying on a cloth business at a rented house. Due to the business at the rented house, the plaintiff is suffering inconvenience and wastage of money in spite of his having a house of his own. Moreover, the suit premises is very much suitable for his business. His landlord is demanding excessive rent for the room where he is carrying on business He asked the defendant to vacate the premises but his request has been fruitless. The plaintiff, moreover, requires the suit premises for building and rebuilding as the house has become old and dilapidated. It has further been alleged that the defendant has been a defaulter in payment of rents from the month of October, 197
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.