SALIL KUMAR HAZRA
BATOKRISTO ROY CO. PVT. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
H. POLESY AND CO. (IMPORTERS) PVT. LTD. – Respondent
( 1 ) TWO petitions filed by Batokristo Roy Company (Private) Limited for setting aside two awards dated May 9, 1969 and July 19, 1969 by the Tribunal of Arbitration of Bengal Chamber of Commerce and Industry were assigned to me by the learned Chief Justice. The first petition was filed on July 30. 1970 for setting aside the award dated July 19, 1969. I shall deal with this petition first. The facts are shortly as follows : Batokristo Roy Company (Private) Ltd. (I shall shortly call Roy Co.) carries on business as importers, exporters and commission agents in jute and jute goods H. Polesy and Co. (Importers) Private Ltd. , a Company incorporated in Australia (I shall shortly call Australian Co.) carries on business as importers and dealers in jute and jute goods.
( 2 ) ON or about March 21, 1968 Roy Co. and Australian Co. entered into a contract whereby Australian Co agreed to buy from Roy Co. and Roy Co. agreed to sell to Australian Co. 200 bales of light wool packs of jute goods of certain specification and description. Under the contract the said goods were to be shipped in 4 monthly instalments of 50 bales each commencing from April 1968 i. e. . 50 bales
Union of India v. Kalinga Construction Co. (P.) Ltd.
Champsey Bhara and Co. v. Jivraj Balloo Spinning and Weaving Co. Ltd.
Ramgopal Lath v. Commonwealth Assurance Co. Ltd.
REFERRED TO : Jivarajbhai Ujamshi Sheth v. Chintamanrao Balaji
Firm Madanlal Roshanlal Mahajan v. Hukumchand Mills Ltd., Indore
Life Insurance Corporation of India v. M.L. Dalmia and Co. Ltd.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.