SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1975 Supreme(Cal) 146

S.C.DEB, DIPAK KUMAR SEN
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX – Appellant
Versus
RAMSEVAK PAUL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.K.ROY, A.N.Shome, A.SEN GUPTA, PAL, SUHAS SEN

DEB, J.

( 1 ) IN this reference under Section 256 (1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, we are concerned with the following question of law :" Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and on a proper construction of sections 147 and 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, the Income-tax Officer was entitled to recompute the business income of the assessee, the reassessment proceedings having been validly initiated to include property income that had escaped assessment ? "

( 2 ) THE statement of the case relates to the assessment years 1959-60 and 1960-61. The assessees' income from house property was determined at Rs. 1,243 and Rs. 1,159, respectively, in these two assessment years by the previous tax officer and with regard to the assessees' income from business, in view of the profit-sharing agreement between the assessees and their employees, it was determined at Rs. 8,139 for the assessment year 1959-60 and out of Rs. 25,045 it was determined at Rs. 12,522 for the assessment year 1960-61.

( 3 ) SUBSEQUENTLY, and before the expiry of 4 years, another tax officer came to know that the assessees had a house at Ghandernagore and its income had escaped assessment. Accordingl












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top