SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1975 Supreme(Cal) 173

DEB, DIPAK KUMAR SEN
SINGHO MICA MINING CO. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
AJIT SEN GUPTA, P.MULLICK, S.B.Mukherji, SUHAS SEN

DIPAK KUMAR SEN, J.

( 1 ) THIS reference arises in respect of the assessment year 1961-62. The facts found are that Singho Mica Mining Co. Ltd. , the assessee, filed its return for the said assessment year on the 28th June, 1962, on which assessment was made on the 4th March, 1966. Subsequently, it was found that the assessee bad not complied with the provisions of Section 18a (3) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, and failed to file its estimate but in the original assessment the Income-tax Officer did not charge any interest under Section 18a (8) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922. The Commissioner considered that this omission to charge interest has resulted in prejudice to the interest of the revenue and after hearing the assessee passed an order under, Section 263 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, directing the Income-tax Officer to compute and recover such interest. Interest was levied accordingly.

( 2 ) IN the meantime, the assessee had preferred an appeal from the original order of assessment before the Appellate Assistant Commissioner which was disposed of by the latter by his order dated the 12th August, 1968.

( 3 ) THE assessee preferred an appeal before the Tribunal from






































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top