SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1975 Supreme(Cal) 119

SALIL KUMAR DATTA
ANIL KUMAR ROY – Appellant
Versus
MANSANATH SHAW – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ARUN KISHORE DAS GUPTA, MADAN MOHAN GHOSH, RADHAKANTA BHATTACHARYA

SALIL KUMAR DATTA, J.

( 1 ) THIS Rule was obtained against order No. 113 dated January 10, 1974 in Money Suit No. 209 of 1963. It appears that the plaintiff instituted the suit on December 12, 1963 claiming (a) a sum of Rupees 4981. 09 for removing silted earth; (b) an amount of compensation for Rs. 500/- as defendant's employee and (c) a salary for two months from June 6, 1962 to August 6, 1962 at the rate of Rs. 120/- for Rs. 240/ -. In all the claim thus was laid at Rs. 4572. 34 giving a credit of Rs. 1142 towards payment of claims (a) and (b) above. It appears that the trial of the suit commenced as early as February 4, 1967 and thereafter on the defendant's application in course of hearing two new issues were framed on February 12, 1973. Issues Nos. 6 and 7 so framed are as follows; " (6) Is the plaintiff's claim regarding Rs. 500/-and Rs. 120/- (?) mentioned in paragraphs 3 and 5 of the plaint are cognizable by this Court (7) Is the plaint liable to be returned. " This order framing additional issues was not challenged by the plaintiff and the issues were taken up for hearing on January 10, 1974 and by the impugned order the learned Munsif held that the two claims mentioned










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top