SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1975 Supreme(Cal) 317

M.M.DUTT, R.K.SHARMA
AMULYA KUMAR SUR – Appellant
Versus
DILIP KUMAR SUR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
MANINDRANATH GHOSH, MONMOHAN MUKHERJI, Saurindranath Roy Choudhuri

M. M. DUTT, R. K. SHARMA

( 1 ) THIS appeal is at the instance of the defendant no. 1 and it arises out of a suit for partition and khas possession.

( 2 ) THE property in suit is a tract of land know as "ghoshaler Abad' comprising within it a jalkar. The plaintiff, since deceased, the predecessor-in-interest of the respondents nos. 1 (1) to (7), and the defendants were co-sharers of the suit property in Mourasi Mokurari right. The defendant no. 1 has 10 annas share equivalent to 5/24th share and the respondents including the respondents nos. 1 (1) to 1 (7) have 6 annas share equivalent to 9/24th share in the suit property. Out of the 9/24th share, the plaintiff had 4/24th share. The 6 annas or the 9/24th co-sharers including the plaintiff, granted a Dar Mourasi Mokurari lease to the defendant no. 1 by an unregistered agreement to lease dated March 29, 1936 at an annual rent of Rs. 846-15-2 pies. Out of the amount of rent defendant no. 1 was to pay a sum of Rs. 171-15-2 pies to the superior landlords and pay the balance sum of Rs. 675/- to the 6 annas co-sharers including the plaintiff in proportion to their respective shares. Clause 12 of the agreement to lease, inter alia, provide











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top