SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1975 Supreme(Cal) 267

SABYASACHI MUKHARJEE
MINOTI HALDER – Appellant
Versus
INCOME-TAX OFFICER, g WARD – Respondent


SABYASACHI MUKHARJI, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner in this application under Article 226 of the Constitution challenges the impugned notice issued under Section 148 of the I. T. Act, 1961, for the assessment year 1956-57. The said notice was issued on the 26th of March, 1973, under Clause (a) of Section 147 of the I. T. Act, 1961. The reasons for reopening the assessment of the assessee have been annexed in the affidavit-in-opposition. The said reasons read as follows :" The assessee maintains a current account with the Bank of India in the name of M/s, Calcutta Plywood Mfg. Co. , a proprietary concern of the assessee, the details of which were not produced at the time of original assessment. From the details of transactions in the said current account obtained from the bank it appears that during the current year 1955 relevant to the assessment year 1956-57, the total deposits were Rs. 5,06,700 against total turnover of the business shown at Rs. 1,89,725. I have, therefore, reason to believe that by reason of the omission or failure on the part of the assessee to disclose fully and truly all material facts necessary for her assessment for the assessment year 1956-57, income amounting t




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top