SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1975 Supreme(Cal) 289

PARIMAL KUMAR CHANDA, SUDHAMAY BASU
BISWANATH AGARWALLA – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
P.C.GHOSH, Probodh Ch.Ghosh, S.K.Palit

PARIMAL KUMAR CHANDA, SUDHAMAY BASU

( 1 ) THIS Rule relates to an order dated the 2nd of July, 1974 passed by the Metropolitan Magistrate, 3rd Court, Calcutta whereby the learned Magistrate framed charges in case no. G. R. 521 of 1973 under section 420 I. P. C. and section 420/109 I. P. C. against the petitioners.

( 2 ) THE prosecution case is that during November, 1970 to February, 1971 the petitioners representing Calcutta Cycle Importing Company of 80d, Bentinck Street, Calcutta had numerous transactions with T. I. and M. Sales Limited in respect of cycles components and other accessories. In course of the transaction goods were supplied to the petitioners against cheques. The goods were sent from Madras to the Branch Office of the T. I. and M. Sales Limited, hereafter referred to as the complainant company. The delivery orders were handed over to the petitioners against cheques with instruction to present the cheque for encashment at a future date. In course of the aforesaid transaction some cheques were encashed but many others were dishonoured. The complainant company pressed for payment of the outstanding cheques and declined to make over further goods. Thereupon the petiti








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top