SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1975 Supreme(Cal) 294

R.BHATTACHARYYA
SURESH CHANDRA SARKAR – Appellant
Versus
GOSAIDAS PAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.K.Ghosal, HARIPADA SAHA, SADHAN GUPTA

R. BHATTACHARYA, J.

( 1 ) THIS revisional application has been filed by the defendant-petitioner Suresh Chandra Sarkar under Section 25 of the Provincial Small Cause Courts Act against the order of the Small Cause Court Judge at Sealdah rejecting his application under Order 9, Rule 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The landlord-opposite party opposes the Rules.

( 2 ) I have heard Mr. Gupta, the learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Ghoshal for the opposite party.

( 3 ) THE petitioner who was the defendant in the original suit for arrears of rent filed against him suffered an ex parte decree and thereafter he filed a petition under Order 9, Rule 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure for setting aside the ex parte decree and for restoration of the suit for hearing on merit. The defendant's case was that the summons of the suit was not served upon him but getting some information he came to know about the ex parte decree. On hearing upon the application filed by the defendant the learned Judge below did not believe the defendant's case. According to him, a registered post card sent by the court about the filing of the suit was refused by the defendant and he had knowledge about t






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top