SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1976 Supreme(Cal) 42

S.C.DEB, DIPAK KUMAR SEN
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX – Appellant
Versus
PROVINCIAL FARMERS (PVT. ) LTD. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.L.PAL, P.K.MAJUMDAR

DEB, J.

( 1 ) THE following questions are involved in this reference under Section 256 (1) of Income-tax Act, 1961 :" (1) Whether, on the facts and circumstances of the case, there was any sale or transfer of capital asset by the assessee attracting the provisions of Section 12b of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 ? (2) If the answer to question No. (1) is in the affirmative, whether, on the facts and circumstances of the case and having regard to the fact that the assessee returned the sum of Rs. 50,785 to the vendor-company, any capital gains accrued to the assessee ?"

( 2 ) THE assessment year is 1963-64. The previous year ended on June 30, 1962. The assessee is a private limited company. It derives income from property and "other sources ".

( 3 ) MESSRS. Sur Estates (P.) Ltd. , hereinafter stated as the "company", was the owner of the house property involved in this reference. The company agreed to sell this property for Rs. 1,30,000 to one Mr. Gostho Behari Sircar. On February 2, 1946, Mr. Sircar filed a suit, being Suit No. 266 of 1946, on the original side of this court against the company for specific performance of the said agreement due to the failure of the company to c





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top