SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1976 Supreme(Cal) 81

N.C.MUKHERJI, B.C.RAY
ASOKE NAIDU – Appellant
Versus
RAYMOND S. MULU – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
BHUPENDRA KUMAR PANDA, NAGENDRA MOHAN SHAH

N. C. MUKHERJI, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal has been filed against the order dated 28th February 1975 passed by the Additional District Judge, 1st Court Midnapore in Misc. Appeal No. 189 of 1974 reversing those of the learned Munsif, Jhargram in J. Misc. Case No. 79 of 1972 under Section 372 of the Indian Succession Act.

( 2 ) THE facts of the case may briefly be stated as follows:--

( 3 ) THE respondent filed an application under Section 372 of the Indian Succession Act for issue of Succession certificate. The respondent's case is that Dr. (Miss) Janaki Naidu, who was a lady doctor attached to Jhargram Sub-Divisional Hospital died at the said hospital unmarried on 19-3-1972. Dr. Naidu was a Hindu and she left the respondent who is her brother as her only heir. Dr. Naidu left some amount in the local Branch of the State Bank of India and the Jihargram Post Office Savings Bank. That the respondent being the sole heir of Dr. Naidu is entitled to apply for a succession certificate.

( 4 ) THE appellant contested the case by filing objection denying that the respondent was the only heir. It is his case that the applicant being a Christian cannot be an heir to a Hindu. His further case is th





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top