SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1976 Supreme(Cal) 174

S.C.DEB, DIPAK KUMAR SEN
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX – Appellant
Versus
RAMJEEWAN SARAWGEE AND SONS. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.SEN GUPTA, B.L.PAL, D.PAL, J.C.SHAH, MANISHA SEAL

DEB, J.

( 1 ) THE following question is involved in this reference under Section 256 (2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961:"whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in holding that the loss claimed by the assessee in respect of the sum of rupees one lakh seventy-nine thousand and two hundred paid by it to M/s. Khardah Company Ltd. was not a loss arising from a speculative transaction and in directing the said sum to be allowed as a loss against the other business income of the assessee. "

( 2 ) THE assessment year is 1961-62. The accounting period ended on November 7, 1961. The assessee is a firm. The facts stated and found by the Tribunal may be briefly stated as follows : The firm is a dealer and a jute broker. Several contracts for sale and for specific delivery of jute goods by instalments were entered into by the firm in the accounting year. In this reference, we are concerned with only one contract, namely, the contract between the firm and Messrs. Khardah Co. Ltd. The firm failed to deliver those goods on due dates and committed a breach of the said contract and became liable to pay Rs. 1,79,200 as damages to M/s. Khardah Co. Ltd. in the















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top