SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1976 Supreme(Cal) 166

SABYASACHI MUKHARJEE
RUSSELL PROPERTIES PVT. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
A. CHOWDHURY, ADDL. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M.K.BANERJI, S.C.SEN

SABYASACHI MUKHARJI, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner, Russell Properties Pvt. Ltd. acquired premises No. 6, Little Russell Street, Calcutta, comprising an area of about 17 cottahs, together with an incomplete building for commercial purpose as well as for the purpose of having its registered office. The petitioner-company, thereafter, completed the construction of the said building and let it out to various tenants. In or about June, 1964, there was an indenture of lease entered into by and between the petitioner-company and the first tenant of the building, M/s. Siemens Engineering and Manufacturing Co. of India Ltd. Assessments for the assessment years 1965-66 and 1966-67 were completed by the Income-tax Officer on the 29th of March, 1971, and 26th of April, 1971, respectively. The question involved in the said assessments was about the true nature and character of the service and maintenance charges received by the assessee-company from its tenants in the multi-storeyed building at No. 6, Little Russell Street, Calcutta. In the said assessments, the Income-tax Officer included the amounts received on account of service and maintenance charges in the rental income and computed the total















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top