SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1976 Supreme(Cal) 363

SALIL KUMAR DATTA, H.N.SEN
NITYA KUMAR CHATTERJEE – Appellant
Versus
SUKHENDU CHANDRA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
KALIPADA CHAKRAVARTI, RAMAPATI ROY, SAKTI NATH MUKHERJI

SALIL KUMAR DATTA, J.

( 1 ) THE opposite party instituted a suit in the Third Court of Subordinate Judge, Ali-pore on March 24, 1975 registered as Title Suit No. 59 of 1975 for a decree of dissolution of partnership of the business called "united Syndicate" carried on by the parties and for accounts, for appointment of a Commissioner for accounts and of Receiver for running partnership business, day to day administration thereof and for collection of assets. The allegations were in short that the defaulting partner, who is the defendant in the suit and the petitioner before us, had been committing serious breaches of agreement of partnership which had been set out in the paragraph 9 of the plaint. It was submitted that as by reason of his conduct it had not been practicable for the plaintiff to carry on the partnership business, it was just and equitable that the partnership should be dissolved.

( 2 ) AS the notice of the suit was served on the defendant he filed an application on 7th April, 1975 not verified by affidavit, stating that under the terms of the written partnership agreement all disputes arising out of the partnership should be referred to the Arbitration. Accordingl












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top