SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

1977 Supreme(Cal) 48

High Court Of Calcutta
A. K. Janah, A. N. Banerjee
SUNDARI DASI - Appellant
Versus
BASUDEO LAL GURALIAR - Respondent
F. A.  227  Of  1970
Decided On : 02/10/1977

Advocates Appeared:
MILAN CHANDRA BHATTACHARJI, NIRENDRA KRISHNA MITRA, PARTHA PRATIN MUKHERJI

The provisions of the Marriage Laws (Amendment) Act, 1976, including Section 39, were applicable to all pending proceedings, whether in the trial court or in appeal.

Headnote:

HINDU MARRIAGE ACT - AMENDMENT - PENDING CASES - APPLICABILITY - SECTION 39 - SCOPE - AMENDMENT OF PLEADING - RIGHT TO AMEND - COURT'S DISCRETION - SECTION 39 (2) - INTERPRETATION.

Fact of the Case:

The respondent filed a petition for judicial separation under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, on the ground of cruelty and desertion. The suit was decreed by the trial court. During the pendency of the appeal, the Marriage Laws (Amendment) Act, 1976, came into force, introducing several changes to the Hindu Marriage Act. The respondent sought to amend the plaint under Section 39 (1) (i) and (2) of the Amendment Act to take advantage of the amended provisions.

Finding of the Court:

The court held that the provisions of the Amendment Act, including Section 39, were applicable to all pending proceedings, whether in the trial court or in appeal. The court observed that the language of Section 39 clearly indicated that the amended provisions were intended to apply to all proceedings, and that the statement of objects and reasons of the Bill introducing the Amendment Act supported this interpretation.

Issues: 1. Whether the provisions of the Marriage Laws (Amendment) Act, 1976, were applicable to pending proceedings in appeal. 2. Whether the respondent was entitled to amend the plaint under Section 39 (1) (i) and (2) of the Amendment Act.

Ratio Decidendi: 1. The court interpreted Section 39 of the Amendment Act to mean that the amended provisions were applicable to all pending proceedings, whether in the trial court or in appeal. The court reasoned that the language of Section 39 was clear and unambiguous, and that the statement of objects and reasons of the Bill introducing the Amendment Act supported this interpretation. 2. The court held that the respondent was entitled to amend the plaint under Section 39 (1) (i) and (2) of the Amendment Act. The court observed that Section 39 (2) gave the court discretion to allow amendments to pleadings to give effect to the provisions of the Amendment Act, and that the respondent had satisfied the court that the amendment was necessary to give effect to the amended provisions.

Final Decision: The court allowed the respondent's application to amend the plaint under Section 10 of the Hindu Marriage Act in terms of the prayer made in paragraph 7 of the petition. The appellant was entitled to file an additional written statement within four weeks from the date of the order.

A. K. Janah, A. N. Banerjee

( 1 ) THIS is an application for leave to amend the plaint under Section 39 (1) (i) and (2) of the Marriage Laws (Amendment) Act, 1976 (Act LXVIII of 1976) filed on behalf of the respondent. The respondent filed a petition against the appellant for judicial separation under Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 on the ground of cruelty and desertion. The suit was decreed by the trial Court. Against that decree the present appeal has been filed by the appellant. During the pendency of the appeal the Marriage Laws (Amendment) Act, 1976 came into force on the 27th May, 1976. Several changes have been introduced in the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 and the Special Marriage Act, 1954 by the said Marriage Laws (Amendment) Act, 1976. Section 10 of the Hindu Marriage Act enumerates the grounds on which a decree for judicial separation could be passed. By Section 4 of the amending Act, Section 10 of the Hindu Marriage Act as it originally stood, has been changed entirely by a new Sub-section (1 ). The amended Sub-section (1) of Section 10 provides that a petition may be presented for a decree for judicial separation on any of the grounds specified in Sub-section (1) of Section 13. Section 7 of the amending Act has replaced Clause (i) of Sub-section (1) of Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act. Section 13 (1) (i) as it stood prior to the amendment was as follows:"13 (1 ). Any marriage solemnized, whether before or after the commencement of this Act, may, on a petition presented by either the husband or the wife, be dissolved by a decree of divorce on the ground that the other party (i) is living in adultery; or"the amended Clause (i) of Sub-section (1) of Section 13 is as follows:" (i) has, after the solemnization of the marriage, had voluntary sexual intercourse with any person other than his or her spouse; or (ia) has, after the solemnization of the marriage, treated the petitioner with cruelty; or (ib) has deserted the petitioner for a continuous period of not less than two years immediately preceding the presentation of the petition; or"the effect of these two amendments has been that a petition for judicial separation may be presented on the ground mentioned in Section 13 (1) (i) as amended. Similarly, the ground for granting a decree for divorce has also been changed. The respondent-petitioner wants to take advantage of the provisions of the Hindu Marriage Act as amended by the amending Act in view of Section 39 of the amending Act. Section 39 of the amending Act makes special provision as to pending cases. The relevant portion of the said section is as follows:"39 (1 ). All petitions and proceedings in causes and matters matrimonial which are pending in any Court at the commencement of the Marriage Laws Amendment) Act, 1976 shall be dealt with and decided by such Court. (i) if it is a petition or proceeding under the Hindu Marriage Act, then so far as may be, as if it had been originally instituted therein under the Hindu Marriage Act, as amended by this Act; (ii ). . . . . (2) in every petition or proceeding to which Sub-section (1) applies, the Court in which the petition or proceeding is pending shall give an opportunity to the parties to amend the pleadings, in so far as such amendment is necessary to give effect to the provisions of Sub-section (1), within such time as it may allow in this behalf and any such amendment may include an amendment for conversion of a petition or proceeding for judicial separation into a petition or proceeding, the case may be, for divorce. "in view of this provision contained in Section 39, the learned Advocate for the respondent-petitioner contends that he is entitled to amend the original petition which was filed by him for judicial separation.

( 2 ) THE learned Advocate for the appellant opposite party has contended that the provisions of the amending Act cannot have any application to proceedings under the Hindu Marriage Act or the Special Marriage Act which have been disposed of b

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top