SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1977 Supreme(Cal) 30

S.C.DEB, S.A.MASUD
BENGAL ASSAM STEAMSHIP CO. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.L.PAL, D.PAL, M.SEAL, P.MAJUMDAR

DEB, J.

( 1 ) THE following questions are involved in this reference under Section 256 (2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 :"1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in law in holding that the period of limitation under Section 154 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, should be computed from the order of the Income-tax Officer under Section 49a of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, dated, February 22, 1961, and not from his order dated September 4, 1963, under Section 154 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, in respect of which rectification of mistake was applied for and in dismissing the appeal on that ground ? Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in law in holding that the period of limitation under Section 154 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, should be computed from the order of the Income-tax Officer under Section 49a of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, dated March 30, 1961, and not from his order dated September 4, 1963, under Section 154 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, in respect of which rectification of mistake was applied for and in dismissing the appeal on that ground?"

( 2 ) THE assessment years invo



Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top