SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1977 Supreme(Cal) 30

High Court Of Calcutta
S. A. Masud, S. C. Deb
BENGAL ASSAM STEAMSHIP CO.LTD. - Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX - Respondent
Income-Taxreference 175 And 176  Of  1971
Decided On : 01/20/1977

Advocates Appeared:
B.L.PAL, D.PAL, M.SEAL, P.MAJUMDAR

The period of limitation for rectification of mistake under the Income-tax Act is computed from the date of the earlier orders, not the subsequent ones.

Headnote:

Limitation - Income-tax Act - Computation of period of limitation for rectification of mistake

Fact of the Case:

The Income-tax Officer passed orders granting reliefs to the assessee under Section 49a of the Act for the assessment years 1954-55 and 1955-56. Subsequently, the Officer modified the orders and rectified certain mistakes. The assessee's applications for rectification were rejected as time-barred, leading to appeals being dismissed.

Finding of the Court:

The court held that the period of limitation for rectification of the Income-tax Officer's orders should be computed from the earlier orders, not the subsequent ones, in respect of both assessment years. The appeals were dismissed as the applications for rectification were time-barred.

Issues: 1. Computation of period of limitation for rectification of mistake under Section 154 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. 2. Justification of dismissing the appeals on the ground of time-barred rectification applications.

Ratio Decidendi: The period of limitation for rectification of mistake under Section 154 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, should be computed from the earlier orders of the Income-tax Officer, not the subsequent ones.

Final Decision: The court returned its answer in the affirmative and in favor of the revenue, dismissing the appeals and ruling that the applications for rectification were time-barred.

DEB, J.

( 1 ) THE following questions are involved in this reference under Section 256 (2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 :"1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in law in holding that the period of limitation under Section 154 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, should be computed from the order of the Income-tax Officer under Section 49a of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, dated, February 22, 1961, and not from his order dated September 4, 1963, under Section 154 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, in respect of which rectification of mistake was applied for and in dismissing the appeal on that ground ? Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in law in holding that the period of limitation under Section 154 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, should be computed from the order of the Income-tax Officer under Section 49a of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, dated March 30, 1961, and not from his order dated September 4, 1963, under Section 154 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, in respect of which rectification of mistake was applied for and in dismissing the appeal on that ground?"

( 2 ) THE assessment years involved arc 1954-55 and 1955-56. In the assessment year 1954-55, the Income-tax Officer passed his order dated February 22, 1961, under Section 49a of the Act granting certain reliefs to the assessee under the Agreement for Avoidance of Double Taxation between India and Pakistan. On September 4, 1963, the Income-tax Officer passed an order under Section 154 by which he modified the order dated February 22, 1961.

( 3 ) IN the assessment year 1955-56, the Income-tax Officer passed his order on March 30, 1961, granting certain reliefs under Section 49a to the assessee in respect of its Pakistan income. On September 4, 1963, the Income-tax Officer rectified his previous order.

( 4 ) ON October 22, 1965, the assessee applied for rectification of certain mistakes in the assessment orders. The Income-tax Officer rejected those applications on February 26, 1966, under Section 154 of the Income-tax, Act, 1961, on the ground that those applications were time-barred. The Income-tax Officer, however, rectified certain mistakes on February 4, 1966. The assessee filed appeals from those orders, but both the appellate authorities dismissed those appeals as the assessee's applications for rectification were time-barred.

( 5 ) DR. D. Pal, learned advocate for the assessee, contended before us that the time to make an application for rectification of the order of the Income-tax Officer should run from his subsequent orders. We are, however, of the opinion that the period of limitation will run from the earlier orders in respect of both the assessment years, and, accordingly, we return our answer in the affirmative and in favour of the revenue. There will be no order as to costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top