SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1977 Supreme(Cal) 195

BIMAL CHANDRA BASAK, A.N.SEN
SUNIL MUKHERJEE – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Jayanta Mitra

SEN, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an appeal against the judgment and order passed by Salil K. Roy Chowdhury, J. on the 15th Nov. 1973. By his order the learned Judge dismissed, for reasons recorded in the judgment, the application made, by the appellant for setting aside an award dated the 28th June, 1971 and also for a declaration that the order dated the 21st Feb. 1961 is invalid, without jurisdiction and of no effect.

( 2 ) THE facts of the case have been fully and correctly set out in the judgment of the learned trial Judge. The facts material for the purpose of the appeal may be briefly stated. The appellant is a building contractor and entered into an agreement dated the 11th April, 1962 with the Union of India for various construction works in and/or of the railway station building at Durgapur. The said agreement contains an arbitration clause. The relevant portion of the said clause reads as follows:"clause 63 (3) (a) Arbitration. Matters in question, dispute or difference to be arbitrated upon shall be referred for decision to. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (ii) Two arbitrators, who shall be Gazetted Railway Officers of equal status to be appointed in the manner laid down

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top