SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1977 Supreme(Cal) 73

High Court Of Calcutta
T. K. Basu
NEPAL CHANDRA BANERJI - Appellant
Versus
COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER - Respondent
C. R. Case 1601 (W)  Of  1969
Decided On : 03/04/1977

Advocates Appeared:
ANIL KUMAR ROY, D.PAL, S.N.DUTTA.

The mere quarrying of stones and breaking them into specified sizes does not amount to a sale.

Headnote:

BENGAL FINANCE (SALES TAX) ACT, 1941 - SECTION 4(2) - SALE - CONTRACTOR COLLECTING STONES FROM RIVER-BED, BREAKING THEM INTO SPECIFIED SIZES AND SUPPLYING THEM TO PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT - WHETHER SALE - HELD, NO SALE - TRANSACTION NOT COVERED BY ACT.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner was appointed as a contractor to collect stones from river-beds, break them into specified sizes, and supply them to the Public Works Department of the Government of West Bengal. The petitioner challenged an order of assessment and certain notices issued under the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941, claiming that the transactions did not amount to a sale and were not covered by the Act.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the petitioner never became the owner of the stones and that the payment of royalty to the Forest Department did not have the effect of transferring the property to the petitioner. Consequently, there was no question of selling the stones to the Public Works Department, and the transactions did not amount to a sale.

Issues: Whether the transactions between the petitioner and the Public Works Department amounted to a sale within the meaning of the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941.

Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the decision of the Supreme Court in Commissioner of Sales Tax, M. P. v. Purshottam Premji, which held that the mere quarrying of stones and breaking them into specified sizes does not amount to a sale. The court also held that the payment of royalty to the Forest Department did not transfer the ownership of the stones to the petitioner.

Final Decision: The court quashed the order of assessment and the notices issued under the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941, and directed the matter to be decided according to law in light of its observations.

T. K. BASU, J.

( 1 ) IN this application, the petitioner challenges an order of assessment dated 21st August, 1963 and certain notices issued under the provisions of the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941 (hereinafter referred to as the Act ).

( 2 ) THE facts relating to the present application may be briefly noted. The petitioner was appointed as a contractor under the Public Works Department of the Government of West Bengal for supply of stone materials of different sizes including boulderss chips and shingles after collecting them from river-beds, in terms of the directions of the Public Works Department, Jalpaiguri.

( 3 ) THE petitioner was appointed as a contractor as aforesaid in terms of a tender which was offered by the petitioner and accepted by the Public Works Department, Government of West Bengal.

( 4 ) SOME of the conditions of the tender, which are annexure C to the petition, are material for the purpose of deciding the controversy in the present case and may be set out below:

( 5 ) THE material portion of Clause 2 of the tender is as follows : the contractor is to deliver the materials on or before the dates mentioned in the tender. . . .

( 6 ) CLAUSE 6 runs as follows : on the completion of the delivery of materials, the contractor shall be furnished with a certificate to that effect, but the delivery will not be considered complete until the contractor shall have removed all the rejected materials and shall have the approved materials stacked or placed in such position as may be pointed out to him.

( 7 ) CLAUSE 7 provides as follows : the material shall be of the best description and in strict accordance with the specification and the contractor shall receive payment for such materials only as are approved and passed by the Executive Engineer or the Sub-Divisional Officer.

( 8 ) CLAUSE 6 of the conditions of the contract provides as follows: On completion of the work, the contractor shall be furnished with a certificate by the Sub-Divisional Officer/divisional Officer (hereinafter called the Engineer-in-charge) of such completion, but no such certificate shall be given, nor shall the work be considered to be complete until the contractor shall have removed from the premises on which the work shall be executed all scaffolding, surplus materials and rubbish and cleaned off the first from all wood-work doors, windows, walls, floors, or other parts of any building in, upon or about which the work is to be executed. . . .

( 9 ) CLAUSE 7 of the conditions runs as follows: no payments shall be made for works estimated to cost less than rupees one thousand, till after the whole of the works shall have been completed and a certificate of completion given.

( 10 ) IT may be mentioned that there was some additional conditions attached to the tender which as I have stated was accepted by the Public Works Department of the Government of West Bengal.

( 11 ) CLAUSE 6 of the additional conditions provides as follows: contractors in the course of their work should understand that all materials (e. g. , store and other materials) obtained in the work of dismantling, excavation, etc. , will be considered Government property and will be disposed of to the best advantage of Government.

( 12 ) ANOTHER material document is a letter dated 24th December, 1962, from the Deputy Chief Engineer, West Bengal, Jalpaiguri, to the petitioner, which is as follows : dear Sir, your rate offered in the separate bid for the above-noted work at 5 per cent less (five per cent less) than the schedule of rates for 1961-62 of Northern Circle, P. W. D. , for collection of stone boulders and shingles and at 5 per cent less (five per cent less) than the schedule of rates for 1962-63 for breaking of stone metal to stone chips (labour only) as well as for carriage of all stone materials, boulders, shingles, etc. , i. e. , amounting to Rs. 3,72,979 against the estimated amount of Rs. 2,98,383 put to tender has been accepted by me for and on behal




















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top