High Court Of Calcutta
CHITTATOSH MUKHERJEE
BIDYA BHUSAN MAHAPATRA - Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL - Respondent
Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction . Of .
Decided On : 03/14/1977
LAND REFORMS - Ceiling on holding - Appeal - Order under Section 14t (3) of the West Bengal Land Reforms Act, 1955 - Appealable under Section 54 of the Act - No interim order can be granted in a writ petition challenging such order.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioners, sons of deceased Balaram Mahapatra, challenged an order passed under Section 14t (3) of the West Bengal Land Reforms Act, 1955, determining the extent of land to be retained by their family and the extent to be vested in the State. They sought interim orders to restrain the respondents from taking any action in furtherance of the order during the pendency of the case.
Finding of the Court:
The court held that the writ petition was not entertainable at that stage as the petitioners had not yet made any application to the Revenue Officer for revising the impugned order under Section 14t (3a) of the Act. Further, an appeal under Section 54 of the Act also lay against the order passed by the Revenue Officer under Section 14t (3).
Issues: 1. Whether the writ petition was entertainable at that stage? 2. Whether an appeal lay against the order passed by the Revenue Officer under Section 14t (3) of the Act?
Ratio Decidendi: 1. The court held that the writ petition was not entertainable at that stage as the petitioners had not yet made any application to the Revenue Officer for revising the impugned order under Section 14t (3a) of the Act. 2. The court held that an appeal under Section 54 of the Act also lay against the order passed by the Revenue Officer under Section 14t (3). The court interpreted Section 54 as conferring a substantive right of appeal against the orders specified in the section, subject to one appeal. It also makes the appellate decision final.
Final Decision: The court rejected the application for interim orders and held that the writ petition was not entertainable at that stage. The court also vacated the interim orders that had been granted earlier.
( 1 ) THE petitioners are the sons of deceased Balaram Mahapatra of village Beruabaid, P. S. Raipur, district Bankura. During his lifetime Balaram Mahapatra had filed a return in Form 7a in terms of Section 14t of the West Bengal Land Reforms Act, 1955 read with Rule 14c of the West Bengal Land Reforms Rules. The Revenue Officer, Sarenga Settlement 'c' Camp, P. S. Raipur district Bankura had directed for scrutiny and verification of the said return submitted by Balaram Mahapatra.
( 2 ) IN the meantime Balaram Mahapatra died and the Revenue Officer directed issue of notices to all members of Balaram Mahapatra's family. Harish Chandra and Sibesh Chandra Mahapatra, two sons of Balaram Mahapatra appeared in the said proceeding claiming that they were separate from their father Balaram Mahapatra and that they enjoyed their properties separately. They contended that they could not be considered as members of their father's family. The Revenue Officer, Sarenga Settlement 'c' Camp refused to accept this submission. He held that Balaram Mahapatra and his family would be entitled to retain 17. 30 acres of non-irrigated land and 6. 92 acres of orchard. The Revenue Officer recorded that some lands belonging to the raiyati family were not shown in the return submitted by Balaram Mahapatra. The petitioners were asked to again exercise their option. The Revenue Officer by his order dated 21st August 1976 recorded that no option had been filed. He allowed the raiyati family to retain 17. 30 acres of non-irrigated land (equivalent to 7 hectors) and 1. 42 acres of orchard (equivalent to 5. 7464 hectors ). A separate schedule of vested lands was also prepared.
( 3 ) THE petitioners in this writ petition have challenged the aforesaid order made under Section 14t (3) of the West Bengal Land Reforms Act, 1955. They have prayed for interim orders to restrain the respondents from taking any action in furtherance of the order dated 21st August, 1976 made in Case No. 15/202 during the pendency of the case. The petitioners were directed to serve copies of the writ petition and all documents in support of their prayer for interim orders upon the respondents.
( 4 ) MR. Ganguli, learned Advocate for the respondents, has raised a preliminary objection. He has submitted that no interim order should be made, as the writ petition itself is not entertainable. The West Bengal Land Reforms Act, 1955 itself provides for remedies for redress of alleged injuries complained of by the petitioners. Mr. Ganguli's submission is that the order complained of is appealable under Section 54 of the West Bengal Land Reforms Act, 1955. Further, under Section 14t (3a) of the Act, the Revenue Officer may on application being made to him or of his own motion revise an order made under sub-section (3) of Section 14t and determine afresh the extent of the land which is to vest in the State under Section 14s and take possession of such land.
( 5 ) THE language of sub-section (3a) of Section 14t is very clear and it provides for re-hearing by the Revenue Officer. A person aggrieved by the determination made by the Revenue Officer on receipt of a return submitted under sub-section (1) or sub-section (2) may apply to the Revenue Officer for revising the said determination order. The Revenue Officer can also suo moto exercise his revisional power under sub-section (3a) after giving the raiyat an opportunity of being heard. The expression ?determine afresh? in sub-section (3a) shows that the Revenue Officer may de-novo decide the extent of the excess land which is to vest in the State. In the instant case, the petitioners have not yet made any application to the Revenue Officer for revising the impugned order under Sections 14t sub-section (3a) of the West Bengal Land Reforms Act.
( 6 ) FURTHER, I hold that an appeal under Section 54 of the West Bengal Land Reforms Act also lies against the aforesaid order under Section 14t of the Act passed by the Revenue Of
AI
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.