SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1977 Supreme(Cal) 96

SABYASACHI MUKHARJEE
BAREILLY ELECTRICITY SUPPLY CO. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent


SABYASACHI MUKHARJI, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an application by Bareilly Electricity Supply Co. Ltd. , filed on the 18th January, 1977, challenging the award dated the 28th September, 1974.

( 2 ) BEFORE I go to the merits of the rival contentions of the parties it has to be mentioned that a preliminary objection was taken as to the maintainability of this application. It was contended that on the 19th January, 1977, the name of the petitioner Company was changed into Bareilly Holdings Limited. Therefore, the petitioner, it was urged, was not entitled to continue the present proceeding in this form and name. As would appear from what is stated above, when the application was made it was a competent application because the change in the name had not taken place at that time. The change took place subsequently. Therefore, in view of the provisions of Section 23 (3) of the Companies Act, 1956 and the facts and circumstances of this case, in my opinion, it would be proper to allow the prayer, on the oral application of Counsel for the petitioner, to change the name of the petitioner to Bareilly Holdings Limited. I, therefore, direct that the name of the petitioner be changed in the records of
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top