SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1977 Supreme(Cal) 365

M.K.MUKHERJEE
CALCUTTA ELECTRIC SUPPLY CORPORATION – Appellant
Versus
ARUN KUMAR DHAR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Biswanath Sanyal, MANAS RANJAN CHAKRAVARTY, SUDHIR BOSE

M. K. MUKHERJEE, J.


( 1 ) IN this revisional application the four petitioners pray for quashing the proceeding of Case No. C/337 of 1975 pending against them in the Court of the learned Metropolitan Magistrte, 11th Court, Calcuta, under S. 42 (b) read with S. 22 of the Indian Electricity Act, 1910.

( 2 ) THE facts leading to the filing of the instant revisional application may be stated as follows: - on 12. 2. 73 the complainant-opposite party filed a petition of complaint in the Court of the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Calcutta, against the four accused-petitioners for having committed offence punishable under S. 42 (b) of the Indian Electricity Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act) read with S. 22 of the Act. The allegations made in the said complaint were that the complainant was inducted as a tenant in premises No. 32b, Brindaban Basak Street, Calcutta-5, in the month of August, 1972, in respect of one ground floor room. The complainant intended to open a plastic manufacturing business in the said room and purchased the requisite machineries, furniture and fixtures for starting the said business and invested a considerable amount for the same. On 21. 8. 72 the complainan













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top