SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1977 Supreme(Cal) 364

S.K.DATTA, SABYASACHI MUKHARJEE, SANKAR PRASAD MITRA
GOUR GOPAL ROY – Appellant
Versus
SIPRA ROY – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
GUNENDRA CHANDRA DE, Jyotirmoyee Nag, PARESH NATH BHATTACHARYA

SANKAR PRASAD MITRA, C. J.

( 1 ) THIS reference has been made under the Second Proviso to Rule 1 of Chapter II of the Appellate Side Rules by a Division Bench consisting of Mr. Justice S. K. Datta and Mr. Justice H. N. Sen.

( 2 ) THE point that arises for our decision is whether the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 can be applied to a person, who is outside the territory to which the Act applies and is not of Indian domicil.

( 3 ) IN the Rule before the Division Bench the petitioner Gour Gopal Roy, husband of the opposite party, Sm. Sipra Roy, had challenged an order of the learned Judge of the 9th Bench, City Civil Court, Calcutta in a Matrimonial action holding that the court had the jurisdiction to try the proceedings.

( 4 ) SUB-SECTION (2) of Section 1 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 provides as follows :"it extends to the whole of India except the State of Jammu and Kashmir, an'd applies also to Hindus domiciled in the territories to which this Act extends who are outside the said territories. "

( 5 ) THE point for consideration of the Special Bench is about the scope and extent of the operation of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. On an analysis of the relevant provisions of the Act











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top