SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1977 Supreme(Cal) 357

S.C.DEB, C.K.BANERJEE
STYA PAUL – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX (CENTRAL) – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.K.ROY, AJIT SEN GUPTA, D.PAL, SUHAS SEN

DEB, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a reference under Section 66 (2) of the Indian I. T. Act, 1922, for the assessment year 1954-55, the previous year ending on 31st March, 1954.

( 2 ) THE assessee is the managing director of Surrendra (Overseas) Pvt. Ltd. for life and of Amin Chand Pyarelal (Calcutta) Ltd. for 20 years. Since his remuneration as the managing director of these two companies has been taxed under the head "salary" and as the appellate authorities have sustained it, we are now concerned with the following questions of law :"1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in holding that the sum of Rs. 31,142 being the managing director's remuneration is taxable under Section 7 of the Indian I. T. Act, 1922? 2. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the managing director's remuneration was properly included in the income of the assessee during the relevant year ? "

( 3 ) IT may be noted here that the learned counsel appearing for both the parties ultimately agreed that our answer to question No. 2 should abide by our answer to question No. 1 and accordingly we have dealt with their arguments only on question No. 1 and have


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top