SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1978 Supreme(Cal) 237

JYOTIRMOYEE NAG
JAGAT JANANI DEBI – Appellant
Versus
JYOTSNA BASU – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
BULU CHATTERJI, MOHENDRA NATH GHOSHAL, SUSHANTA CHATTERJEE

JYOTIRMOYEE NAG, J.

( 1 ) ALONG with the Rule, there is an application Under Section 5 of the Limitation Act in respect of the instant revisional application. By an order dated 8-4-75, P. K. Banerjee, J. when issuing the Rule directed that the application for condonation of delay be considered at the time of hearing of the Rule. In that application in paras 4 and 5 an explanation has been given by the petitioner why the revisional application could not be filed in time. I am satisfied with the explanation given and accordingly I condone the delay and I take up the matter (the revisional application) for hearing.

( 2 ) THIS revisional application is made against the judgment and order dated 10th Dec. 1974 passed by Sri S. K. Biswas, Additional District Judge, 2nd Court, Howrah, passed in Misc. Appeal No. 39 of 1974 reversing the order made in Misc. Case No. 41 of 1971 by the learned Munsif, 1st Court, Howrah. The petitioner filed a Title Suit, being Title Suit No. 140 of 1967 for dissolution of partnership and for accounts. The defendants Nos. 1 and 2 appeared in the suit and filed written statement. A decree was passed on 16-11-71 ex parte as the defendants failed to appear or to







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top