SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1978 Supreme(Cal) 249

DEB, SUDHINDRA MOHAN GUHA
CHANDRA KANTA AGARWALLA – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.SEN GUPTA, KALYAN ROY, PRABIR MAJUMDAR, R.N.DUTTA

DEB, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a reference under Section 256 (1) of the the I. T. Act, 1961. The assessee is an individual. The statement of the case relates to the assessment years 1966-67 to 1969-70.

( 2 ) THE assessee is the wife of one Chandra Kumar Agrwalla. She is the mother of two minor daughters, Dipika and Gitika. She is also the mother of a minor son, Sandwip, who was born during the accounting year relevant to the assessment year 1969-70.

( 3 ) IN the course of the assessment proceedings for the aforesaid assessment years the ITO found that no income from dividends in respect of certain shares was shown by the assessee. He also found that some of those shares were also sold in the accounting year relevant to the assessment year 1969-70 and capital gains had arisen from such sales and it was not shown by the assessee. Being asked by him to explain the position, the assessee filed an affidavit.

( 4 ) SHE stated in that affidavit that she was a member of a HUF styled as "chandra Kumar Agarwalla, HUF" of which her husband was the karta and other members were Dipika and Gitika. She also stated in that affidavit that in or about 1965 all those shares valued at Rs. 1,90,027'39 were













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top