SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1978 Supreme(Cal) 295

P.C.BOROOAH, S.C.MAJUMDAR
BIDYUT KUMAR SETT – Appellant
Versus
SATYESH CHANDRA BAGCHI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
BIREN MITRA, D.K.DUTTA, DEBESH CHANDRA MUKHERJI, DEBOPROSAD MUKHERJI, N.A.CHAUDHARY

P. C. BOROOAH, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioners are directors of Messrs. P. Sett and Co. Private Ltd. having its registered office and factory at No. 3, Rama-kanta Sen Lane, within police station Manicktola, in the city of Calcutta.

( 2 ) ON June 5, 1976, the opposite party No. 1, Satyesh Chandra Bagchi, an Insurance Inspector under the Employees' State Insurance Corporation, Calcutta, filed a petition of complaint against the two petitioners and another in the court of the Judicial Magistrate at Sealdah alleging commission of offences under Section 85 (a) and (g) of the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 (hereinafter the Act), read with Section 4 (i) (b) of the Employees' State Insurance (Amendment) Act, 1975, for violation of Regulation 26 (c) of the Employees' State Insurance (General) Regulations, 1950 (hereinafter the Regulations), for failure to submit the necessary contribution cards for the periods expiring on November 11, 1975, and January 31, 1976, within the statutory period.

( 3 ) THE learned Magistrate, on the basis of the aforesaid petition of complaint, took cognizance and issued summons against the two petitioners and another under Section 85 (a) and (g) of the Act. In















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top