SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1978 Supreme(Cal) 527

DIPAK KUMAR SEN, C.K.BANERJEE
HINDUSTAN GAS AND INDUSTRIES LTD. – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
AJIT SEN GUPTA, N.K.PODDAR, P.MAJUMDAR, SUKUMAR BHATTACHARYA

DIPAK KUMAR SEN, J.

( 1 ) HINDUSTHAN Gas and Industries Ltd. , the assessee, incurred expenditure of Rs. 10,080 and Rs. 50,687, respectively, for payment of professional charges to its solicitors, Messrs. Orr, Dignam and Co. , for preparing a prospectus in connection with the issue of its preference shares and payment of underwriting commission and brokerage for the issue of the same, in the assessment year 1964-65, the corresponding previous year having ended on the 31st March, 1964. In its assessment to income-tax the assessee claimed deduction of the said expenditure from its business income. The ITO disallowed the claim on the ground that the said items were not expenditure of a revenue nature. On appeal, the AAC confirmed the order of the ITO. There was a further appeal by the assessee to the Tribunal. It was contended on behalf of the assessee before the Tribunal, inter alia, that the said amounts of expenditure should be treated as revenue expenditure. It was further contended that the said expenditure was incurred in respect of issue of not equity shares but redeemable preference shares. It was submitted that there was hardly any difference between a debenture and redeemab













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top