SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1978 Supreme(Cal) 664

High Court Of Calcutta
Dipak Kumar Sen, Sudhindra Mohan Guha
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX - Appellant
Versus
CALCUTTA HYDRAULIC PRESS ASSOCIATION - Respondent
Income-Tax Reference 533  Of  1972
Decided On : 12/21/1978

Advocates Appeared:
B.K.Bagchi, Debi Pal

An association of employers can be entitled to exemption from income tax under Section 10 (24) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, if it is formed primarily for the purpose of regulating relations between employers and their workmen, even if it has other objects.

Headnote:

INCOME TAX - Exemption - Association of employers - Whether formed primarily for the purpose of regulating relations between employers and their workmen - Section 10 (24) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

Fact of the Case:

The assessee, a registered trade union under the Indian Trade Unions Act, 1926, claimed exemption from income tax on its income from interest and dividend under Section 10 (24) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The assessee's objects included regulating relations between members and their employees, imposing restrictive conditions on the conduct of trade, adjusting and controlling production, securing advantageous terms from balers, protecting members against competition, securing enactment of beneficial legislation, and collecting and circulating statistics.

Finding of the Court:

The Tribunal found that the assessee was formed primarily for the purpose of regulating relations between employers and their workmen and that it was administering a welfare fund utilized only for the benefit of the workers. The Tribunal held that the assessee was entitled to the exemption under Section 10 (24).

Issues: Whether the assessee was formed primarily for the purpose of regulating relations between employers and their workmen and thus entitled to the exemption under Section 10 (24) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the Tribunal's finding that the assessee was formed primarily for the purpose of regulating relations between employers and their workmen was not erroneous or perverse. The court also held that the decisions cited by the revenue, which involved the question of whether property or income was wholly or exclusively used for charitable or religious purposes, were not relevant to the issue in the present case.

Final Decision: The court answered the question referred to it in the affirmative and in favor of the assessee.

DIPAK KUMAR SEN, J.

( 1 ) CALCUTTA Hydraulic Press Association, the assessee, was registered under the Indian Trade Unions Act, 1926, in or about April, 1952. The objects of the assessee as appearing in its rules and regulations are, inter alia, as follows :"the object of the association is to regulate relations between the members and their employees and between member and members and additionally the objects of the association are to include the following: (b) to impose restrictive conditions on the conduct of the trade; (c) to adjust and/or control the production and working of the jute press houses in the membership of the association ; (d) to secure by agreement advantageous terms from balers in relation to baling in jute press houses; (e) to protect the members of the association against competition; (f) to secure the enactment of legislation beneficial to the trade ; (g) to secure the repeal of any legislation or prevent the passing of legislation which is damaging or may in any way damage the trade ; (h) to collect, classify and circulate statistics ; (i) to adopt common forms of agreements ; (j) to establish funds for the purposes of the members and/or for the benefit of employees of the members ; (k) to assist or amalgamate with other associations or societies or federations of associations or societies, having for the objects or one of their objects the promotion of the interests of the jute trade ; (l) to do all such other lawful things as are incidental or conducive to the attainment of the above objects or any of them.

( 2 ) IN the assessment year 1962-63, the relevant accounting periods being the year ending on the 31st December, 1961, in respect of its general fund and the year ending on the 30th June, 1961, in respect of its operating fund, the assessee filed a return showing a loss of Rs. 4,909. The assessee claimed that as a mutual association its income could not be charged to tax. The source of the income of the general fund being only the subscription of members the ITO accepted such claim of the assessee and did not take into account either the income or the expenditure relating to this fund in computing the taxable income of the assessee. But the ITO found that the sources of the operating fund were, (a) deductions from production agreements, and (b) interest and dividend from investments. The income from the first source was found to be derived by rendering a specific service to some of its members and as such chargeable to income-tax under Section 28 (ii) of the I. T. Act, 1961. The income accruing to the operating fund from the other source, viz. , interests from securities and dividend, were claimed by the assessee as exempt from income-tax under Section 10 (24) of the I. T. Act, 1961. The ITO, however, held that, as the activities of the assessee did not relate to regulation of the relation of its members and their employees but were confined mainly to the protection and promotion of the trade interests of its members, it could not be said that the assessee was an association formed primarily for the purpose of regulating relations between workmen and workmen. As such the assessee's income from "interest on securities and dividend" was not exempt from tax as claimed and was chargeable to tax. The income of the assessee was assessed accordingly. Similar assessments were made in the assessment years 1963-64, 1964-65 and 1965-66.

( 3 ) BEING aggrieved, the assessee preferred appeals from the said assessments. The AAC found that the assessee was registered under the Indian Trade Unions Act, 1926, and, construing its rules and regulations, concluded that the assessee had been constituted primarily for the purpose of regulating the relations between workmen and employers as also workmen and workmen, and that the other objects enumerated in the rules were only additional objects which may or may not be performed. He held that the provisions of Section 10 (24) of the Act were attracted in the facts and


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top