SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1978 Supreme(Cal) 86

SABYASACHI MUKHARJEE, SUDHINDRA MOHAN GUHA
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX – Appellant
Versus
SHYAM NARAIN MEHROTRA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
AJIT SEN GUPTA, SUHAS SEN

SABYASACHI MUKHARJI, J.

( 1 ) IN this reference, we are concerned with the assessment year 1962-63 relevant to the financial year 1961-62. The assessee is an individual. During the relevant year, he sold 1,150 shares of Bharat Woollen Mills Ltd. to his brother, Sri P. N. Mehrotra, at the rate of Rs. 10 per share, for a sum of Rs. 11,500. The break-up value of those shares, on the basis of the balance-sheet, would have been Rs. 50,209 on the date of the transfer. The ITO was, therefore, of the opinion that the provisions of Section 52 (1) of the I. T. Act, 1961, were applicable. It was contended on behalf of the assessee that under Section 47 (iii) of the Act, a gift was not regarded as transfer of a capital asset and was not assessable to capital gains and the transaction was a deemed gift within the meaning of the definition of the G. T. Act, 1958, The ITO did not accept this contention. He, therefore, treated the difference of a sum of Rs. 46,126 in the value of those shares on the basis of the balance-sheet of the company and the price charged as capital gains, which amounted to Rs. 7,417 already declared by the assessee and included the remaining amount of Rs. 38,709 in the as
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top