SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1978 Supreme(Cal) 111

SALIL KUMAR ROY CHOWDHURY
UNION OF INDIA (UOI) – Appellant
Versus
NARESH CHAND GOYAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.K.BACHAVAT, P.K.Sen

SALIL K. ROY CHOWDHURY, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an application under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act, 1940, for stay of suit.

( 2 ) THE facts relevant for the purpose of this application are as follows:-- By a public auction held by the Auctioneer, the respondent No. 3, United Auctioneer, on the 21st of Feb. 1964, on behalf of Union of India 400 M. T. of scrap rails of the specification mentioned in the auction catalogue were offered for sale and the respondent No. 1 was declared to be the highest bidder and he deposited the earnest money in terms of the said sale, which included General Conditions of Sale by auction contained in the said auction catalogue. The General Conditions of Contract as contained in the said auction catalogue inter alia contain terms of inspection of the goods at various locations by the intending purchaser and also removal of the goods by the purchaser after making full payment against which release orders will be issued by the officers of the respondent No. 3 at various places where goods were lying. The said sale was on the basis of 'as is where is' basis. The General Conditions of contract as contained in the auction catalogue also contained an arbitration
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top