SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1978 Supreme(Cal) 426

DIPAK KUMAR SEN, C.K.BANERJEE
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX – Appellant
Versus
KANAN DEVAN HILLS PRODUCE COMPANY LTD – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.K.ROY, A.K.SEN GUPTA, Debi Pal, SUHAS SEN

DIPAK KUMAR SEN, J.

( 1 ) THE facts found and/or admitted in these proceedings are shortly as follows: m/s. Kanan Devan Hills Produce Company Ltd. , Calcutta, the assessee, has been carrying on business in cultivation, manufacture and sale of tea. In the assessment years 1966-67 and 1967-68, the corresponding previous years being the calendar years ending on 30th November of 1965 and 1966, respectively, the assessee claimed deduction, inter alia, of amounts paid as " overseas allowance ", " managing allowance ", " devaluation allowance " and " transport allowance " to some of its employees, in the computation of its business profits and income. It was contended that these items did not represent any benefit or amenity or perquisite within the meaning of Section 40 (c) (iii) of the I. T. Act, 1961, as it stood at the relevant time and were fully deductible.

( 2 ) THE ITO rejected the claim of the assessee and added back 40% of the amounts claimed.

( 3 ) BEING aggrieved by the additions the assessee preferred appeals therefrom. The AAC accepted the contentions of the assessee and held that on a proper construction of Section 40 (c) (iii) the allowance in question paid directly to
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top