SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1978 Supreme(Cal) 449

B.N.MAITRA
BISWANATH DAS – Appellant
Versus
DEBIPROSAD PAUL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D.N.LAHIRI, P.N.MITTER, R.N.Mitra, S.C.MITRA, S.D.Ghosh

B. N. MAITRA, J.

( 1 ) TITLE Suits Nos. 252 of 1963 and 121 of 1964 were tried together. In the earlier Suit No. 252, the plaintiff's allegation is that the premises No. 601, Diamond Harbour Road, belonged to Debiprosad Paul and Umaprosad Paul, out of these 7 (seven) shop rooms located in that premises, the disputed shop room was let out to Biswanath Das (plaintiff) at a rental of Rs. 18/- per month payable according to English Calendar. The agreement was that the tenancy would commence from the 1st June, 1963. The defendants accepted the rent for June in advance and a receipt was granted. On the 11th June, 1963, the plaintiff took some articles to that shop. The defendants demanded premium from him. The plaintiff declined to make such payment. The police was falsely informed that he had stored his belongings in the room in question. The suit is for a declaration that the plaintiff is a tenant in respect of the disputed land under the defendants and for an injunction.

( 2 ) THE defendants filed a written statement alleging inter alia that the plaintiff's case was absolutely false. No settlement was granted to the plaintiff, who was a trespasser.

( 3 ) IN the latter Title Suit No













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top