SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1978 Supreme(Cal) 444

N.C.MUKHERJI
GANESH CHANDRA BAG – Appellant
Versus
RASHBEHARI CHAKRABARTI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Prabir Kumar Samanta, S.C.MITRA, SUSHANTA KUMAR KUNDU

N. C. MUKHERJI, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an appeal against the judgment and decree passed by Sri S. K. Biswas, Subordinate Judge, 3rd Court, Midnapore, dated 13-6-68 in Title Appeal No. 682 of 1977 affirming those of Sri A. K. Sil, Munsif, 2nd Court, Tamluk, dated 27-9-67 in Title Suit No. 287 of 1965.

( 2 ) THE plaintiff is the appellant in this Court. The plaintiff seeks a declaration to the effect that the kobala described in the 'kha' schedule to the plaint in favour of the defendants Nos. 1 to 3 in respect of the suit land is fraudulent and collusive and as such not binding upon the plaintiff. The plaintiff also prays for permanent injunction restraining the defendants Nos. 1 to 3 from interfering with the plaintiff's possession of the same. According to the plaintiff 'ka' sch. lands along with other lands belonged to the plaintiff's grand-father Trailokya. His son was Sudhir, The plaintiff is the eldest son of Sudhir. Sudhir had two sons who predeceased the plaintiff. Defendant No. 4 is the second wife of Sudhir. The plaintiff and his father used to stay with Trailokya who was affectionate to them. Trailokya subsequently executed a registered deed of Arpannama on 12th Baisakh, 1356





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top