SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1978 Supreme(Cal) 464

AMIYA KUMAR MUKHERJI
FORT WILLIAM CO. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
INSPECTOR, CENTRAL EXCISE – Respondent


AMIYA KUMAR MOOKERJI, J.

( 1 ) COMMON questions of law are involved in these Rules, accordingly, these Rules are heard together and my judgment in Civil Rule No. 5479 (W) of 1977 shall govern all other Rules.

( 2 ) PETITIONER is a public limited company. Its business consists, inter alia, of manufacture of jute products consisting of carpet backing, hessian sacking, bagging cloth including jute yarn and jute twine for the purpose of jute textiles manufacturing business.

( 3 ) BY an Order No. S. O. 149 (A) dated 25th February, 1976 issued in pursuance of the powers conferred by Section 9 (1) of the Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), the Central Government specified the classes of goods manufactured or produced wholly or in part of jute in the scheduled industry of Textiles as mentioned in column (2) of the table set out in the said order on which a duty of excise was to be levied and collected as a cess for the purpose of the said Act for a period of one year commencing from 1st March, 1976 at the rates specified in the corresponding entry in column No. 3 of the said table. Column No. (3) 6f the said table provides that Rs. 3.
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top