SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1978 Supreme(Cal) 459

M.M.DUTT, D.C.CHAKRAVORTI
NABIN MAJHI – Appellant
Versus
TELA MAJHI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
PRAMATHA NATH PALIT, SAMARENDRA KUMAR DUTT

M. M. DUTT, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal is at the instance of the defendant and it arises out of a suit for partition. The appeal involves interpretation of the New Explanation VIII which has been added to Section 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure by the Code of Civil Procedure (Amendment) Act, 1976.

( 2 ) THE plaintiffs instituted the suit claiming partition by metes and bounds of their half share in the suit property. The principal defence of the defendant was that prior to this suit he had instituted a suit against the plaintiffs, being Title Suit No. 69 of 1961, in the First Court of the Munsif at Rampurhat, for a declaration of his title to. 10 acre of land appertaining to C. S. Plot No. 1183. In that suit, it was inter alia contended by the defendant that there was a previous partition. The said suit was decreed on a finding that there was an amicable partition of the suit property. It was urged by the defendant that the finding of the learned Munsiff in the said Title Suit No. 69 of 1961 would operate as res judicata in the present suit.

( 3 ) THE learned Subordinate Judge overruled the contention of the defendant that the finding in the earlier suit operated as res judicata in





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top