SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1978 Supreme(Cal) 367

PADMA KHASTGIR
BALI RAM DHOTE – Appellant
Versus
BHUPENDRA NATH BANERJEE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
AJOY ROY, N.C.CHAUDHARY

PADMA KHASTGIR, J.

( 1 ) BY an agreement dated 29th of June 1966 the plaintiff herein Baliram Dhote agreed to purchase and Bhupendra Nath Banerjee, Jitendra Nath Banerjee, Abanindra Nath Banerjee and Nihar Bala Devi agreed to sell the premises No. 8/1, Hazra Road. The salient. terms and conditions of the said agreement are set out as hereunder : --1. The Vendors agree to sell and the purchaser agrees to purchase all that the said premises No. 8/1, Hazra Road, Calcutta, fully and particularly mentioned and described in the Schedule hereunder written (hereinafter referred to as the said premises) for an absolute and indefeasible estate of inheritance in fee simple in possession or an estate equivalent thereto free from all encumbrances whatsoever at or for the sum of Rupees 2,80,000/- (Rupees Two lacs Eighty Thousand) only subject to the vendor's making out a good and marketable title thereto.

( 2 ) THE purchaser has this day paid to the vendors a sum of Rs. 10,001/- (Rupees Ten thousand and one) only as and by way of earnest money and in part payment of the consideration money and the balance sum will be paid by the purchaser to the vendors on or before the execution of the convey


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top