SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1978 Supreme(Cal) 409

JYOTIRMOYEE NAG
AJIT KUMAR SARKAR – Appellant
Versus
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ALOK K.BISWAS, ANJAN MUKHERJI, BALAI CHANDRA ROY, J.N.GHOSH, L.N.DATTA, M.P.Mukherji

JYOTIRMOYEE NAG, J.

( 1 ) CRIMINAL Revision Nos. 732-34 of 1977 are taken up together as they involve the same points of law and will accordingly be governed by this judgment. The rules in these cases are directed against criminal proceedings pending before the learned Metropolitan Magistrate for prosecution of the petitioner and others for offences under the Companies Act, viz. , under Sections 159 and 162 (1) of the said Act. The petitioner along with the other members of the family is a shareholder of the company carrying on a business in coal trade named A. Sircar Sons (Private) Ltd. of 60/20, Gouri Bari Lane, Calcutta. The petitioner is the managing director of the said company. It is the case of the petitioner that day-to-day management along with the management of the business was entrusted to his elder brother, Rajendra Nath Sarkar, one of the directors of the said company, as the petitioner had to manage another business as managing agent/contractor of a small colliery at Asansol and be was so engaged during the period 1954 to 1960. The petitioner would come to Calcutta on casual visits and then he enquired from his brothers about the functioning of the business at Calcut















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top