D.C.CHAKRAVORTI, M.M.DUTT
BALAI KUMAR SARKAR – Appellant
Versus
BIMAL CHANDRA SARKAR – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS Rule is at the instance of the defendant No. 1 and it is directed against Order No. 2 dated Feb. 16, 1977 of the Subordinate Judge, 4th Court, Alipore. The suit out of which this Rule arises has been instituted by the plaintiff-opposite party No. 1 against the petitioner and others for the recovery of the sum of Rs. 38,951. 10. The opposite party No. 1 filed an application under Order 38, Rule 5 of the Civil P. C. for attachment before judgment, inter alia, alleging therein that the defendants were avoiding payment of the plaintiff's dues and with intent to obstruct or delay the execution of the decree that would be passed in the suit against the defendants, they were about to dispose of their assets and had removed and/or had been removing their property from the local limits of the jurisdiction of the Court. Further, it was alleged that the defendants were trying to receive payment of the money from the Additional Chief Engineer, Bandel Thermal Power Station payable to the firm 'sarkar and Sarkar' of which the petitioner is the sole owner, in respect of the construction of the Training Institute-cum-Trainees Hostel at the said Power Station. By the impu
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.