SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1978 Supreme(Cal) 164

R.N.PYNE, GHOSH
INCOME-TAX OFFICER, "B" WARD – Appellant
Versus
BRITISH PAINTS INDIA LTD. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
AJIT SEN GUPTA, B.L.PAL, Debi Pal, P.K.PAL, R.N.Dutt

R. N. PYNE, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal is directed against a judgment and order dated January 17, 1973, of T. K. Basu J. [1974] TLR 115 allowing the respondent company's application made under art. 226 of the Constitution challenging the validity of five notices all dated 14th December, 1964, issued under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1965 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") in respect of the assessment years 1956-57, 1957-58, 1958-59, 1959-60 and 1961-62. By the aforesaid notices the appellant sought to reopen the respondent's assessments in respect of the aforesaid years.

( 2 ) OUT of the aforesaid five notices the learned judge of the court of first instance cancelled and rescinded four notices relating to the assessment years 1956-57 to 1959-60 and directed the appellant to forbear from giving effect thereto in any manner whatsoever. The learned judge however upheld the notice for the assessment year 1961-62 and as there is no appeal against that decision it is not necessary for us to refer to the said notice for the assessment year 1961-62.

( 3 ) AS the learned judge of the court of the first instance in his judgment has set out the relevant facts of this case in detail,








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top