SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1978 Supreme(Cal) 214

DIPAK KUMAR SEN, C.K.BANERJEE
SURAJMALL GOUTI – Appellant
Versus
CONTROLLER OF ESTATE DUTY – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.C.S.CHARI, B.L.PAL, K.RAY, SUHAS SEN

DIPAK KUMAR SEN, J.

( 1 ) THIS reference arises out of estate duty proceedings in respect of the estate of one Madan Chand Gouti, who died on the 18th March, 1966. The facts found and/or admitted are, inter alia, that during his lifetime the deceased was a partner in the firm of M/s. Chouthmull Joychandlal Gouti (hereinafter referred to as " the firm") having 12. 5% interest (1/8th share) therein. One of the assets of the said firm was a jute press named Gouti Jute Press consisting of five godowns held under a lease for 61 years. The business of the firm consisted mainly of letting out the said godowns from which substantial income was earned. The material clauses in the deed of partnership dated the 10th April, 1965, were, inter alia, as follows:"11. In case of death or retirement of any partner or of any minor admitted to the benefits of the partnership, the partnership business shall not stand dissolved but outgoing partner or legal representative of the deceased partner shall be entitled to be paid the capital and the value of Ms share and interest in the firm including that in the said jute press after the same is determined on valuation by mutual consent. For this purpose, a






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top