SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(Cal) 464

A.K.SENGUPTA, BHAGABATI PRASAD BANERJEE
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX – Appellant
Versus
INDIAN EXPLOSIVES LTD. – Respondent


AJIT K. SENGUPTA, J.

( 1 ) IN this reference at the instance of both the assessee and the Commissioner, as many as seven questions have been referred to this court under Section 256 (1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, for the assessment years 1971-72 and 1972-73 :" 1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and on a correct interpretation of Section 80j of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and Rule 19a of the Income-tax Rules, 1962, the Tribunal was right in holding that the exclusion of borrowed capital from the computation of capital employed in two new industrial undertakings for the purpose of Section 80j was not at all justified ?

( 2 ) WHETHER, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and on a correct interpretation of Section 80j of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and Rule 19a of the Income-tax Rules, 1962, the Tribunal was correct in holding that, in computing the capital employed in the two new industrial undertakings for the purpose of Section 80j, current liabilities were to be excluded ?

( 3 ) WHETHER, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and on a correct interpretation of Section 80j of the Income-tax Act, 1961, the Tribunal was correct in hold



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top