SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(Cal) 477

A.K.SENGUPTA, BHAGABATI PRASAD BANERJEE
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX – Appellant
Versus
JAGANNATH STEEL CORPORATION – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
DEBASIS MITRA, S.N.DEY

AJIT K. SENGUPTA, J.

( 1 ) THIS reference under Section 256 (1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, relates to the assessment year 1984-85. The facts are in a narrow compass. During the year of account ending on March 31, 1984, being the previous year relevant to the assessment year 1984-85, the assessee collected an aggregate sum of Rs. 5,03,310 as and by way of Central sales tax. During the said year of account, the assessee paid in the aggregate Central sales tax of Rs. 4,02,136 leaving a balance of Rs. 1,01,174 which was taken to the balance-sheet. The Income-tax Officer, invoking the provisions of Section 43b of the Income-tax Act, 1961, added the said sum of Rs. 1,01,174 to the income returned by the assessee. On his part, the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) declined to interfere in the matter. Thereupon, the assessee moved the Tribunal. The Tribunal was of the view that if the assessee is allowed time under the statute governing payment of sales tax and such payment is made within the period so prescribed even though after the close of the accounting year, this payment cannot come within the purview of Section 43b of the Act. The assessee claimed before the Tribunal that the






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top