SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(Cal) 27

P.D.DESAI, A.K.SENGUPTA
ATMARAM KANORIA – Appellant
Versus
L. K. R. PRASAD – Respondent


P. D. DESAI, AJIT KUMAR SENGUPTA, JJ.

( 1 ) PER Chief Justice (Oral) - In order to appreciate the issues arising for decision in this Contempt Petition, it is necessary to set out the facts in some detail.

( 2 ) THE petitioners are the owners of a property being land with superstructures bearing premises No 14, Ballygunge Park, Calcutta. They intended to demolish the existing superstructures and to raise a twelve storied residential building on the said premises. They, therefore, submitted the requisite sets of Budding Plans for sanction to the Calcutta Municipal Corporation, hereinafter referred to as "the Corporation Authorities", on or about August 26, 1987. The Building Plans were "accepted conditionally for further scrutiny" subject to certain conditions by the Corporation Authorities. From time to time thereafter certain objections/requisitions were served upon the petitioners and they are stated to have been duly complied with by the submission of revised Building Plans, whenever necessary or required.

( 3 ) IT is the case of the petitioners that the matter ultimately went up to the Municipal Building Committee which raised certain additional points and required certain fu





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top